ThinkyTimes (thinkytimes.com) publishes daily news for children ages 8–11 as audio episodes and graphic-novel comics. During U.S. Media Literacy Week, ThinkyTimes’ weekday episodes help young readers understand headlines, sources, and how news is made. Free to read and listen at thinkytimes.com.
Finland ranks first in Europe’s Media Literacy Index, and Finns’ trust in news remains among the highest in the world. In the US, trust in news has fallen to 25%. What can American classrooms learn from Finland?
Stephen Lee, Co-Founder and CEO of Augmented Media Literacy, has lived in Finland for about 25 years. In 2018, he started a project with Finnish journalists and a PhD researcher to help people read media better. In this talk, he shares what Finnish students learn about the news, and four ways to see through media in anything you read: spotting clickbait headlines, noticing emotional language, checking sources and viewpoints, and comparing coverage across outlets.
Educators who attend will be the first to see and have the chance to try the Augmented Media Literacy Chrome extension beta for free.
The extension is based on the last 8 years of development in cooperation with teams in the US and Finland. We are excited to show you what our research has led us to and get your feedback.
Visit https://augmentedmedialiteracy.com for more information and to join the waitlist for the tool.
Register (free): https://forms.gle/Ytk89UL7eARA1ZhM7
Watch live: https://www.youtube.com/live/WGVoOJPs_pU
Contact: contact@augmentedmedialiteracy.com
Walk the Line is an embodied, discussion-based activity in which participants hold a “standing conversation” about media, technology, and society. Facilitators read aloud a series of provocative prompts. Discuss statements like “Social media has done more harm than good for teenagers” or “Companies should be legally responsible for what their algorithms recommend.” See how participants physically move to a spot along a line or continuum that represents their position, from strong agreement to strong disagreement.
Once everyone has taken a stand, the facilitator invites people from different points on the line to explain their reasoning, and participants may move as they hear ideas that shift their thinking. Because opinions become visible and movement is encouraged, the activity surfaces the genuine disagreement that lives inside any group and makes changing your mind a normal, low-stakes act rather than a concession. Through participation, learners will:
(1) articulate and defend a personal position on a contested issue involving media, technology, and society;
(2) recognize the range of viewpoints held within their own community and identify the values, experiences, and evidence that shape them;
(3) practice active listening and respectful disagreement by responding directly to peers’ reasoning;
(4) evaluate how framing and word choice in a prompt can shape an opinion; and
(5) reflect on their own openness to revising a belief in light of new arguments or information.
In this session, you’ll learn how to use this instructional strategy in face-to-face and online learning contexts!
School librarian, Brooke Baker, and Project Look Sharp co-director, Chris Sperry, explore adolescent metacognition and media literacy in the age of AI. REGISTRATION REQUIRED.
Primary Audience: this webinar is designed for middle school and high school educators and librarians; library media specialists; teacher librarians; school administrators; college faculty; and librarians.
It’s easy to question an answer we disagree with, but what happens when a chatbot tells us exactly what we want to hear? This interactive webinar explores how the affirming and validating nature of conversational AI can make critical evaluation more difficult for students. We’ll connect emerging research on adolescent AI use with Project Look Sharp’s approach to metacognition and Constructivist Media Decoding, then put those strategies into practice with a hands-on media literacy activity. Participants will leave with Project Look Sharp resources and practical ways to help students pause, question, and think critically about AI responses–even when those responses feel right.
